On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:03 AM Chris Poulsen <
[hidden email]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
Hello!
> I've just gotten around to test our products against Tapestry 5.5
> (master/HEAD) - Everything seems to work fine with the latest code, good
> work!
>
Thanks for the info!
> Would it be possible to get a tagged beta (or rc) version published to some
> repository that we can rely on for stable builds?
> I can see several 5.4 beta/rc versions in central (
>
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tapestry/tapestry-core ),
> that would work well for us. I can see a single 5.4-beta on apache staging,
> but it seems unclear how long we can expect things to be present in
> "staging".
>
Unless we delete the betas, I'd expect them to be present mostly forever.
>
> --
> Chris
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I've just committed a fix for this issue.
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:35 PM Oliver Kaiser <
[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > given something like this:
> > >
> > > public interface Blub {
> > > public default String foo() {
> > > return "Default";
> > > }
> > > }
> > > public class BlubImpl implements Blub {
> > > @Override
> > > public String foo() {
> > > return "Impl";
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > when calling "registry.getService(Blub.class).foo()" using beta-1 this
> > > works as expected (BlubImpl is called); when using beta-2 only the
> > > default method is called.
> > >
> > > the log output of PlasticProxyFactory shows that the method is skipped
> > > in the generated class
> > >
> > > seems to be related to this commit
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://github.com/apache/tapestry-5/commit/709d282bfc626ce55cde07cbf909c0b86c2b4bcb#diff-89a017b694cffee07e15608bc316d0d7> > >
> > > now "proxyInterface(Class, PlasticMethod)" only
> > > calls "introduceInterface(Class, PasticMethod)" (which skips the method
> > > as "isDefaultMethod(m)" returns true); earlier versions had an
> > > additional for-loop which handled this case (at least from stepping
> > > though in a debugger it looks that way)
> > >
> > >
> > > that's a regression, right?
> > >
> > >
> > > btw: thanks to everyone who worked on the 5.4->5.5 transition; updating
> > > was very smooth!
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[hidden email]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[hidden email]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Thiago
> >
>
--
Thiago
Locked
